https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344307 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order that denied Cenvat Credit on L.N. Towers. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation for issuing the show cause notice was not applicable due to the ongoing dispute regarding the eligibility of Cenvat Credit on the towers. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief, emphasizing the unresolved controversy surrounding the availment of Cenvat Credit on L.N. Towers. en-us Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jun 2017 18:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344307 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order that denied Cenvat Credit on L.N. Towers. The Tribunal held that the extended period of limitation for issuing the show cause notice was not applicable due to the ongoing dispute regarding the eligibility of Cenvat Credit on the towers. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief, emphasizing the unresolved controversy surrounding the availment of Cenvat Credit on L.N. Towers. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344307