https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344296 The case involved an allegation of clandestine removal of goods without payment of duty, supported by forged export proof. The appellants were denied cross-examination of key witnesses, leading to a violation of natural justice principles. Despite the reliance on documentary evidence, the importance of cross-examination was emphasized. The appeals were remanded to allow cross-examination of witnesses, ensuring a fair adjudication process. en-us Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:13:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344296 The case involved an allegation of clandestine removal of goods without payment of duty, supported by forged export proof. The appellants were denied cross-examination of key witnesses, leading to a violation of natural justice principles. Despite the reliance on documentary evidence, the importance of cross-examination was emphasized. The appeals were remanded to allow cross-examination of witnesses, ensuring a fair adjudication process. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344296