<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 564 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty, interest, and penalties against M/s.Karware Impex Pvt. Ltd. for diverting imported raw materials under the DEEC Scheme and failing to fulfill export obligations. The seized stainless steel coils/sheets were liable for confiscation, with the matter remanded for considering redemption. The appeal was allowed in part, confirming the demand and upholding the confiscation of goods, while proceedings against high sea sellers were not interfered with due to non-involvement in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 564 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty, interest, and penalties against M/s.Karware Impex Pvt. Ltd. for diverting imported raw materials under the DEEC Scheme and failing to fulfill export obligations. The seized stainless steel coils/sheets were liable for confiscation, with the matter remanded for considering redemption. The appeal was allowed in part, confirming the demand and upholding the confiscation of goods, while proceedings against high sea sellers were not interfered with due to non-involvement in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>