<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 559 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344288</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directing the AO to delete the addition to the extent of Rs. 10,67,992, confirming the balance addition of Rs. 19,85,008. The Tribunal found that since the turnover declared already included all deposits, no further addition on account of the deposited amount was justified. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO should consider the benefit of withdrawals when treating deposits as income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 08:12:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 559 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344288</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and directing the AO to delete the addition to the extent of Rs. 10,67,992, confirming the balance addition of Rs. 19,85,008. The Tribunal found that since the turnover declared already included all deposits, no further addition on account of the deposited amount was justified. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO should consider the benefit of withdrawals when treating deposits as income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>