<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1233 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192702</link>
    <description>Deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act was noted as having already been answered against the Revenue in a connected matter. Consideration of the remaining questions was adjourned, so the document records only the prior adverse finding on the deemed dividend issue and the deferral of the balance of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:35:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1233 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192702</link>
      <description>Deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act was noted as having already been answered against the Revenue in a connected matter. Consideration of the remaining questions was adjourned, so the document records only the prior adverse finding on the deemed dividend issue and the deferral of the balance of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>