<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Rules: Amendments Cannot Revive Expired Anti-Dumping Duty Notifications.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35233</link>
    <description>Imposition of ADD - retrospective amendment to the notification - When Notification dated January 02, 2009 itself had lapsed on the expiry of five years, i.e. on January 01, 2014, and was not in existence on January 23, 2014 question of amending a non-existing Notification does not arise at all. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 08:03:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 08:03:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Rules: Amendments Cannot Revive Expired Anti-Dumping Duty Notifications.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35233</link>
      <description>Imposition of ADD - retrospective amendment to the notification - When Notification dated January 02, 2009 itself had lapsed on the expiry of five years, i.e. on January 01, 2014, and was not in existence on January 23, 2014 question of amending a non-existing Notification does not arise at all. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 08:03:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>