https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344265 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals and setting aside the orders demanding reversal of CENVAT credit. It emphasized the validity of availing credit based on service tax paid by the airport operator under Airport Services. The Tribunal supported the appellant's argument that services received were correctly classified under Airport Services, citing a Supreme Court judgment. It highlighted the importance of consistent classification by service providers and upheld the appellant's right to avail CENVAT credit in this instance. en-us Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jun 2017 08:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344265 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeals and setting aside the orders demanding reversal of CENVAT credit. It emphasized the validity of availing credit based on service tax paid by the airport operator under Airport Services. The Tribunal supported the appellant's argument that services received were correctly classified under Airport Services, citing a Supreme Court judgment. It highlighted the importance of consistent classification by service providers and upheld the appellant's right to avail CENVAT credit in this instance. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344265