https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344260 The tribunal set aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant for alleged clandestine removal of goods due to insufficient evidence. The appellant successfully argued that the allegations were based on assumptions and that the inputs were not received clandestinely, as previously ruled by the tribunal in a related case. As a result, the duty demand was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted. en-us Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jun 2017 06:35:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344260 The tribunal set aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant for alleged clandestine removal of goods due to insufficient evidence. The appellant successfully argued that the allegations were based on assumptions and that the inputs were not received clandestinely, as previously ruled by the tribunal in a related case. As a result, the duty demand was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344260