<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 523 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344252</link>
    <description>The court remanded the case to the Settlement Commission to reconsider the decoding of figures while upholding the findings on money lending activities. The court directed a prompt decision within three months and maintained the original order pending the fresh decision on decoding. The writ petition was deemed maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India despite objections raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 07:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472067" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 523 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344252</link>
      <description>The court remanded the case to the Settlement Commission to reconsider the decoding of figures while upholding the findings on money lending activities. The court directed a prompt decision within three months and maintained the original order pending the fresh decision on decoding. The writ petition was deemed maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India despite objections raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344252</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>