<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 518 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344247</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to verify tax payments by the parties regarding disallowed processing fee and hire charges under section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal reduced the disallowance of car and telephone expenses for personal use, restricting it to 1/10 of the total expenditure claimed instead of 1/6, based on the firm&#039;s declared income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 06:34:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 518 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344247</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to verify tax payments by the parties regarding disallowed processing fee and hire charges under section 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal reduced the disallowance of car and telephone expenses for personal use, restricting it to 1/10 of the total expenditure claimed instead of 1/6, based on the firm&#039;s declared income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>