<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 517 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344246</link>
    <description>The appeals for assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2008-09 were allowed, setting aside the additions made by the Assessing Officer. For assessment year 2009-10, the appeal was partly allowed, upholding the addition of Rs. 5,00,000/- as unexplained cash credit, restricting the &#039;deemed dividend&#039; addition to Rs. 1,50,000/-, and deleting the adhoc disallowance of expenses. The stay applications were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 06:34:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 517 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344246</link>
      <description>The appeals for assessment years 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2008-09 were allowed, setting aside the additions made by the Assessing Officer. For assessment year 2009-10, the appeal was partly allowed, upholding the addition of Rs. 5,00,000/- as unexplained cash credit, restricting the &#039;deemed dividend&#039; addition to Rs. 1,50,000/-, and deleting the adhoc disallowance of expenses. The stay applications were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>