<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (5) TMI 2 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8160</link>
    <description>Benami ownership of shares is ordinarily a factual inference based on the source of purchase money, lack of contribution by nominal holders, and their non-exercise of shareholder rights. Proof that the deceased provided the consideration shifts the burden to ostensible holders to establish an intended beneficial interest. A Hindu female who is merely a name-lender has no pre-existing interest capable of enlargement into absolute ownership under the Hindu Succession Act. Although the deceased was the beneficial owner, shares registered in benamidars&#039; names were not property he was legally competent to dispose of without a release or declaration; they therefore did not pass on death for estate duty purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (5) TMI 2 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8160</link>
      <description>Benami ownership of shares is ordinarily a factual inference based on the source of purchase money, lack of contribution by nominal holders, and their non-exercise of shareholder rights. Proof that the deceased provided the consideration shifts the burden to ostensible holders to establish an intended beneficial interest. A Hindu female who is merely a name-lender has no pre-existing interest capable of enlargement into absolute ownership under the Hindu Succession Act. Although the deceased was the beneficial owner, shares registered in benamidars&#039; names were not property he was legally competent to dispose of without a release or declaration; they therefore did not pass on death for estate duty purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 May 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>