<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (9) TMI 26 -  CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8159</link>
    <description>Revisionary power was upheld where assessments were made hastily without proper enquiry into jurisdictional facts, the truth of the returns, the alleged residence and business address, and the source and genuineness of the initial capital. Notice of the specific grounds had been given, but the assessee failed to produce satisfactory evidence; accordingly, the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 33B setting aside the assessments and directing fresh assessment was sustained. The challenge based on breach of natural justice and alleged lack of bona fides failed because the Commissioner&#039;s preliminary enquiries and prima facie observations did not show that issues were decided behind the assessee&#039;s back or for an impermissible purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (9) TMI 26 -  CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8159</link>
      <description>Revisionary power was upheld where assessments were made hastily without proper enquiry into jurisdictional facts, the truth of the returns, the alleged residence and business address, and the source and genuineness of the initial capital. Notice of the specific grounds had been given, but the assessee failed to produce satisfactory evidence; accordingly, the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 33B setting aside the assessments and directing fresh assessment was sustained. The challenge based on breach of natural justice and alleged lack of bona fides failed because the Commissioner&#039;s preliminary enquiries and prima facie observations did not show that issues were decided behind the assessee&#039;s back or for an impermissible purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>