<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (1) TMI 23 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8154</link>
    <description>Mere co-ownership, joint residence, joint cultivation or common management of agricultural land does not, by itself, create an association of individuals under the Agricultural Income-tax Act. The decisive requirement is that property must be held by one person for himself or for another in a legally recognised representative capacity; absent that, spouses cannot be assessed as an association of individuals. Questions about title standing in one spouse&#039;s name, factual beneficial ownership, or a land-exchange sanction were treated as irrelevant to that legal test. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, and assessment on that footing could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (1) TMI 23 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8154</link>
      <description>Mere co-ownership, joint residence, joint cultivation or common management of agricultural land does not, by itself, create an association of individuals under the Agricultural Income-tax Act. The decisive requirement is that property must be held by one person for himself or for another in a legally recognised representative capacity; absent that, spouses cannot be assessed as an association of individuals. Questions about title standing in one spouse&#039;s name, factual beneficial ownership, or a land-exchange sanction were treated as irrelevant to that legal test. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, and assessment on that footing could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>