https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8145 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction to assess the petitioner as a Hindu undivided family (HUF) based on the revised returns filed by the petitioner. The court found the petitioner had suppressed material facts and misrepresented information to avoid tax liability. The court concluded the application was without merit and mala fide, ordering the petitioner to pay costs to the respondents and vacating any interim orders. en-us Fri, 04 Dec 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8145 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction to assess the petitioner as a Hindu undivided family (HUF) based on the revised returns filed by the petitioner. The court found the petitioner had suppressed material facts and misrepresented information to avoid tax liability. The court concluded the application was without merit and mala fide, ordering the petitioner to pay costs to the respondents and vacating any interim orders. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 04 Dec 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8145