<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (11) TMI 15 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8142</link>
    <description>For depreciation under section 10(2)(vi) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the expression &quot;building&quot; was construed to mean only the superstructure. Land or site beneath the building was excluded from that term, so depreciation was allowable only on the superstructure and not on the land.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (11) TMI 15 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8142</link>
      <description>For depreciation under section 10(2)(vi) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the expression &quot;building&quot; was construed to mean only the superstructure. Land or site beneath the building was excluded from that term, so depreciation was allowable only on the superstructure and not on the land.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>