<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (3) TMI 48 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8141</link>
    <description>Income arising to a spouse from assets transferred without adequate consideration is includible in the transferor&#039;s total income under the clubbing provisions, and capital gains are not excluded from &quot;income&quot; for that purpose. For reassessment under section 147(a), however, the decisive question is whether the assessee failed to disclose fully and truly all primary material facts necessary for assessment. Once the transfer of assets to the spouse was disclosed, the inference about any later capital gains was for the assessing authority to draw. Mere omission to state that the spouse subsequently realised capital gains did not amount to nondisclosure of material facts, so the reassessment notice was invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (3) TMI 48 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8141</link>
      <description>Income arising to a spouse from assets transferred without adequate consideration is includible in the transferor&#039;s total income under the clubbing provisions, and capital gains are not excluded from &quot;income&quot; for that purpose. For reassessment under section 147(a), however, the decisive question is whether the assessee failed to disclose fully and truly all primary material facts necessary for assessment. Once the transfer of assets to the spouse was disclosed, the inference about any later capital gains was for the assessing authority to draw. Mere omission to state that the spouse subsequently realised capital gains did not amount to nondisclosure of material facts, so the reassessment notice was invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>