https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8131 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the disputed property's nature as separate or joint Hindu family property required factual determination. It found little distinction between proceedings under the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act and the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the need for investigating objections before sale. While acknowledging the petitioner's right to establish title in civil court, relief under article 226 was denied due to available alternative remedies. Each party was ordered to bear their costs, and the stay order was lifted. en-us Fri, 13 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8131 The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the disputed property's nature as separate or joint Hindu family property required factual determination. It found little distinction between proceedings under the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act and the Income-tax Act, emphasizing the need for investigating objections before sale. While acknowledging the petitioner's right to establish title in civil court, relief under article 226 was denied due to available alternative remedies. Each party was ordered to bear their costs, and the stay order was lifted. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 13 Nov 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8131