<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 509 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344238</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order and overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue against the Assessee. The Court found that the Tribunal erred in not considering the statutory provisions and factual findings of the Commissioner (Appeals). It emphasized the requirement for the Assessee to demonstrate that the duty burden was not passed on to customers to claim a refund. Additionally, the Court invalidated the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on a judgment that had been overturned by the Supreme Court. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was allowed with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 509 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344238</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order and overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue against the Assessee. The Court found that the Tribunal erred in not considering the statutory provisions and factual findings of the Commissioner (Appeals). It emphasized the requirement for the Assessee to demonstrate that the duty burden was not passed on to customers to claim a refund. Additionally, the Court invalidated the Tribunal&#039;s decision based on a judgment that had been overturned by the Supreme Court. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was allowed with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>