<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 504 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344233</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, affirming the admissibility of input service credit on outward transportation. It found that the contractual terms and judicial precedents supported the inclusion of transportation costs as an input service, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal relied on the judgment in Ambuja Cements Ltd. Vs. UOI from the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court, which overturned the earlier decision cited by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:57:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 504 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344233</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, affirming the admissibility of input service credit on outward transportation. It found that the contractual terms and judicial precedents supported the inclusion of transportation costs as an input service, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal relied on the judgment in Ambuja Cements Ltd. Vs. UOI from the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court, which overturned the earlier decision cited by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>