https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344228 The Tribunal found both the petitioner and the second respondent eligible to file their respective petitions but dismissed the allegations of oppression and mismanagement against each other. No relief was granted, but the Tribunal suggested the petitioner sell shares to other shareholders at a fair value determined mutually or by an independent valuer. Both petitions were disposed of without costs, with parties directed to determine share value within two months or seek the Tribunal's intervention for an independent valuation if no agreement is reached. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:56:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344228 The Tribunal found both the petitioner and the second respondent eligible to file their respective petitions but dismissed the allegations of oppression and mismanagement against each other. No relief was granted, but the Tribunal suggested the petitioner sell shares to other shareholders at a fair value determined mutually or by an independent valuer. Both petitions were disposed of without costs, with parties directed to determine share value within two months or seek the Tribunal's intervention for an independent valuation if no agreement is reached. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344228