<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 495 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all three appeals filed by the assessee, directing the deletion of disallowances under Section 14A and corresponding additions to book profits for MAT computation. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of recording satisfaction by the AO before applying Rule 8D and the requirement of incriminating material for assessments under Section 153A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:55:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 495 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all three appeals filed by the assessee, directing the deletion of disallowances under Section 14A and corresponding additions to book profits for MAT computation. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of recording satisfaction by the AO before applying Rule 8D and the requirement of incriminating material for assessments under Section 153A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>