<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 490 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344219</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and canceled the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that since the income was charged under Minimum Alternate Tax provisions, imposing a penalty for additions made under normal provisions was not justified. This decision aligns with the clarification by the CBDT and is supported by the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case, upheld by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:55:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 490 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344219</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and canceled the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that since the income was charged under Minimum Alternate Tax provisions, imposing a penalty for additions made under normal provisions was not justified. This decision aligns with the clarification by the CBDT and is supported by the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case, upheld by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>