https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192673 An order granting interim custody of a seized vehicle under Section 451 CrPC is interlocutory because it does not finally determine the parties' rights, so revision under Section 397(2) is barred and revisional interference on that basis is without jurisdiction. In deciding interim custody, the registration certificate is relevant evidence of ownership but not a conclusive document of title; the court must assess the better prima facie claim on the materials before it. Interim custody therefore need not invariably go to the registered owner, and a custody order favouring another claimant will not be interfered with unless shown to be legally unsustainable. en-us Fri, 23 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192673 An order granting interim custody of a seized vehicle under Section 451 CrPC is interlocutory because it does not finally determine the parties' rights, so revision under Section 397(2) is barred and revisional interference on that basis is without jurisdiction. In deciding interim custody, the registration certificate is relevant evidence of ownership but not a conclusive document of title; the court must assess the better prima facie claim on the materials before it. Interim custody therefore need not invariably go to the registered owner, and a custody order favouring another claimant will not be interfered with unless shown to be legally unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192673