<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 1109 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192668</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that the loan amount was genuine. The Court emphasized that the source of the source need not be proven and ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 1,70,000 from the appellant&#039;s income. This resolved the dispute regarding the cash credits and the burden of proof on the revenue department for the Assessment Year 1993-94.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2017 10:00:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 1109 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192668</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that the loan amount was genuine. The Court emphasized that the source of the source need not be proven and ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 1,70,000 from the appellant&#039;s income. This resolved the dispute regarding the cash credits and the burden of proof on the revenue department for the Assessment Year 1993-94.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>