<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1209 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192669</link>
    <description>The court allowed the revision filed by the assessee, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order demanding security for goods seized during transportation from Delhi to Bihar. The court emphasized that the valid Transit Declaration Form accompanied the goods with established identity, and mere apprehension of potential sale in U.P. was not sufficient grounds for seizure. Citing legal precedents, the court held that material particulars in the form were crucial, and the department could ensure tax compliance without requiring security for release, focusing on preventing tax evasion while maintaining procedural fairness in seizing goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1209 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192669</link>
      <description>The court allowed the revision filed by the assessee, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order demanding security for goods seized during transportation from Delhi to Bihar. The court emphasized that the valid Transit Declaration Form accompanied the goods with established identity, and mere apprehension of potential sale in U.P. was not sufficient grounds for seizure. Citing legal precedents, the court held that material particulars in the form were crucial, and the department could ensure tax compliance without requiring security for release, focusing on preventing tax evasion while maintaining procedural fairness in seizing goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>