<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 469 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344198</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant. The increase in redemption fine and penalties under the Central Excise Rules was challenged successfully. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s explanation for the non-recording of finished goods and found no evidence of clandestine removal, disagreeing with the Revenue&#039;s contentions. The appellant was granted consequential relief, with the impugned order being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2017 05:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 469 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344198</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant. The increase in redemption fine and penalties under the Central Excise Rules was challenged successfully. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s explanation for the non-recording of finished goods and found no evidence of clandestine removal, disagreeing with the Revenue&#039;s contentions. The appellant was granted consequential relief, with the impugned order being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>