<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 459 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344188</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the transaction did not qualify as a financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, rejecting the petition for Insolvency Resolution Process against the Respondents. The Petitioner was directed to seek redressal through an appropriate forum without prejudice to their rights, with no costs awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 459 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344188</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the transaction did not qualify as a financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016, rejecting the petition for Insolvency Resolution Process against the Respondents. The Petitioner was directed to seek redressal through an appropriate forum without prejudice to their rights, with no costs awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>