<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 451 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344180</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 62,91,279 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the disallowance of Rs. 1,39,297 claimed as Mould Repairs and Maintenance Expenses. The ITAT emphasized the significance of concrete evidence, accepted the documentary evidence provided by the assessee, and considered the consistent treatment of expenses in other assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2017 05:45:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 451 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344180</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 62,91,279 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the disallowance of Rs. 1,39,297 claimed as Mould Repairs and Maintenance Expenses. The ITAT emphasized the significance of concrete evidence, accepted the documentary evidence provided by the assessee, and considered the consistent treatment of expenses in other assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>