<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 450 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(l)(c) for the short disclosure of interest on the income tax refund by the assessee firm. Despite acknowledging the mistake in failing to disclose the interest income, the Tribunal found it to be inadvertent and not deliberate concealment. Emphasizing the importance of due diligence by taxpayers, the Tribunal quashed the penalty order, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2017 05:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 450 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(l)(c) for the short disclosure of interest on the income tax refund by the assessee firm. Despite acknowledging the mistake in failing to disclose the interest income, the Tribunal found it to be inadvertent and not deliberate concealment. Emphasizing the importance of due diligence by taxpayers, the Tribunal quashed the penalty order, allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>