https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192666 A complaint instituted in the name of a local authority through its authorised Food Inspector is treated as a complaint by the local authority itself, and general authority under the food law does not require sanction-like proof or a detailed factual application of mind. Objection to the complainant's authority should be taken at the proper stage, not raised for the first time after disposal of the appeal. A Public Analyst's report is legally adequate where it contains the analytical data and result from which adulteration can be inferred; it need not set out the detailed mode of analysis. The stated effect is that such materials can support conviction under the food adulteration law. en-us Thu, 31 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jun 2017 18:55:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192666 A complaint instituted in the name of a local authority through its authorised Food Inspector is treated as a complaint by the local authority itself, and general authority under the food law does not require sanction-like proof or a detailed factual application of mind. Objection to the complainant's authority should be taken at the proper stage, not raised for the first time after disposal of the appeal. A Public Analyst's report is legally adequate where it contains the analytical data and result from which adulteration can be inferred; it need not set out the detailed mode of analysis. The stated effect is that such materials can support conviction under the food adulteration law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192666