https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192662 The court held that a company does not enjoy immunity from prosecution under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. If found guilty, a company can be fined, even though imprisonment cannot be imposed. The court's interpretation aimed to advance legislative intent and ensure companies are accountable for food adulteration offenses. The criminal appeal was to be posted before the Division Bench for disposal based on the court's findings. en-us Fri, 14 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jun 2017 18:04:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192662 The court held that a company does not enjoy immunity from prosecution under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. If found guilty, a company can be fined, even though imprisonment cannot be imposed. The court's interpretation aimed to advance legislative intent and ensure companies are accountable for food adulteration offenses. The criminal appeal was to be posted before the Division Bench for disposal based on the court's findings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192662