https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192661 The court ruled in favor of the respondent, a large landowner, in the dispute with the Municipal Council regarding the refund of profession tax payments made from 1926 to 1930. The judge found that the payments were voluntary as there was no evidence of protest or compulsion. The judgment emphasized the necessity of a real threat to deem a payment as non-voluntary, citing relevant case law. The concurring judge agreed with the decision, leading to the dismissal of the suit for refund of tax payments. en-us Tue, 19 Jan 1937 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:56:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192661 The court ruled in favor of the respondent, a large landowner, in the dispute with the Municipal Council regarding the refund of profession tax payments made from 1926 to 1930. The judge found that the payments were voluntary as there was no evidence of protest or compulsion. The judgment emphasized the necessity of a real threat to deem a payment as non-voluntary, citing relevant case law. The concurring judge agreed with the decision, leading to the dismissal of the suit for refund of tax payments. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Jan 1937 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192661