<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1933 (11) TMI 21 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192660</link>
    <description>Liability to profession tax under the District Municipalities Act turned on whether the firm had its principal office within municipal limits; on the facts, Tuticorin was only one local centre of operations, so the firm was not treated as liable. On recoverability of tax payments, only payments made under real compulsion or duress can be reclaimed. A statutory demand notice, even with a threat of distraint and a right of appeal, does not by itself make payment involuntary. Payments made without objection in the ordinary course were treated as voluntary, while a payment expressly made under protest was treated differently and recoverable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:50:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1933 (11) TMI 21 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192660</link>
      <description>Liability to profession tax under the District Municipalities Act turned on whether the firm had its principal office within municipal limits; on the facts, Tuticorin was only one local centre of operations, so the firm was not treated as liable. On recoverability of tax payments, only payments made under real compulsion or duress can be reclaimed. A statutory demand notice, even with a threat of distraint and a right of appeal, does not by itself make payment involuntary. Payments made without objection in the ordinary course were treated as voluntary, while a payment expressly made under protest was treated differently and recoverable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>