https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192657 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the prosecution under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, in a case where the appellant was convicted for using adulterated oil. The Court clarified that general authorization for consent to prosecute was permissible even before the Act's amendment in 1964. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions and setting a precedent based on established legal interpretations. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:35:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192657 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the prosecution under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, in a case where the appellant was convicted for using adulterated oil. The Court clarified that general authorization for consent to prosecute was permissible even before the Act's amendment in 1964. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions and setting a precedent based on established legal interpretations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Sep 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192657