https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344161 The Court upheld the seizure of goods due to discrepancies in the transit declaration form. The Tribunal's order was modified to release the goods upon depositing 15% of their value and furnishing an indemnity bond for the remaining 85%, subject to legal proceedings. The revisionist's challenges regarding non-service of notices and valuation of goods were dismissed, affirming the authorities' jurisdiction under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 to verify goods passing through the state. en-us Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344161 The Court upheld the seizure of goods due to discrepancies in the transit declaration form. The Tribunal's order was modified to release the goods upon depositing 15% of their value and furnishing an indemnity bond for the remaining 85%, subject to legal proceedings. The revisionist's challenges regarding non-service of notices and valuation of goods were dismissed, affirming the authorities' jurisdiction under the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 to verify goods passing through the state. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344161