<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue Allegation Dismissed: Authority Rejects Claims of Underreported Clearance Value and Duty Discrepancies Based on Verification Report.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35203</link>
    <description>Valuation - According to the Revenue, while clearing the rejected slag, they were showing less clearance value and paying less duty on that, and the reversal/payment of duty was not equal to the credit availed by them - Once adjudicating authority dropped the demand on the basis of verification report, revenue cannot take the different stand - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 10:27:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 10:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue Allegation Dismissed: Authority Rejects Claims of Underreported Clearance Value and Duty Discrepancies Based on Verification Report.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35203</link>
      <description>Valuation - According to the Revenue, while clearing the rejected slag, they were showing less clearance value and paying less duty on that, and the reversal/payment of duty was not equal to the credit availed by them - Once adjudicating authority dropped the demand on the basis of verification report, revenue cannot take the different stand - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 10:27:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>