https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344158 The Tribunal found that the services provided did not fall under 'Erection, Commissioning and Installation Services' but rather constituted a 'Works Contract' involving both goods and services. Consequently, the Tribunal granted a complete waiver of the pre-deposit for the service tax amount, interest, and penalties, emphasizing the incorrect classification by the Revenue. Recovery was stayed pending the appeal, reflecting the Tribunal's decision on the misclassification issue. en-us Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:40:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344158 The Tribunal found that the services provided did not fall under 'Erection, Commissioning and Installation Services' but rather constituted a 'Works Contract' involving both goods and services. Consequently, the Tribunal granted a complete waiver of the pre-deposit for the service tax amount, interest, and penalties, emphasizing the incorrect classification by the Revenue. Recovery was stayed pending the appeal, reflecting the Tribunal's decision on the misclassification issue. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344158