https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344155 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)'s order demanding interest under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act on the appellants' payment of differential duty for electric meters supplied to KSEB. Relying on the SKF India Ltd. case, the Tribunal found the demand for interest valid, rejecting the appellants' arguments of lack of consideration, absence of show-cause notice, and time-barred claim. The decision favored the Revenue, dismissing all three appeals on 07/06/2017. en-us Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Jul 2017 10:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344155 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)'s order demanding interest under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act on the appellants' payment of differential duty for electric meters supplied to KSEB. Relying on the SKF India Ltd. case, the Tribunal found the demand for interest valid, rejecting the appellants' arguments of lack of consideration, absence of show-cause notice, and time-barred claim. The decision favored the Revenue, dismissing all three appeals on 07/06/2017. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344155