<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 419 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the sales tax remission received under the Economic Development of Kutch District scheme is a capital subsidy and should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty. The extended period for issuing the show cause notice was deemed inapplicable, and the appeal was allowed, aligning with the precedent set in the Welspun Corporation Ltd. case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:38:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 419 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the sales tax remission received under the Economic Development of Kutch District scheme is a capital subsidy and should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty. The extended period for issuing the show cause notice was deemed inapplicable, and the appeal was allowed, aligning with the precedent set in the Welspun Corporation Ltd. case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>