<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 400 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344129</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The disallowance of depreciation was overturned after the assessee submitted additional evidence of fixed assets purchased. The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to verify and allow depreciation. In terms of the addition on account of inflated purchases, the ITAT restricted the addition and instructed applying a GP rate of 10% on the goods purchased. The appeal was partly allowed, with the ITAT issuing the order on June 7, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:36:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 400 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344129</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The disallowance of depreciation was overturned after the assessee submitted additional evidence of fixed assets purchased. The ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to verify and allow depreciation. In terms of the addition on account of inflated purchases, the ITAT restricted the addition and instructed applying a GP rate of 10% on the goods purchased. The appeal was partly allowed, with the ITAT issuing the order on June 7, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>