<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 397 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344126</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was canceled due to the defective statutory notice issued under section 274, which did not specify the grounds for the penalty, and the substantiated claim of business purpose for the expenses related to Nepal. The Tribunal held that a vague notice violates principles of natural justice and does not satisfy legal requirements, resulting in the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 397 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344126</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was canceled due to the defective statutory notice issued under section 274, which did not specify the grounds for the penalty, and the substantiated claim of business purpose for the expenses related to Nepal. The Tribunal held that a vague notice violates principles of natural justice and does not satisfy legal requirements, resulting in the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>