<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1394 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192647</link>
    <description>The court condoned the delay in re-filing the appeal, admitted the appeal for further deliberation on the disallowance of business profits under Section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of TDS, and upheld the remand of the Transfer Pricing issue to the Transfer Pricing Officer for fresh adjudication. The court emphasized the need for all contentions on the Transfer Pricing issue to be presented before the TPO during the reevaluation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 05:34:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1394 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192647</link>
      <description>The court condoned the delay in re-filing the appeal, admitted the appeal for further deliberation on the disallowance of business profits under Section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of TDS, and upheld the remand of the Transfer Pricing issue to the Transfer Pricing Officer for fresh adjudication. The court emphasized the need for all contentions on the Transfer Pricing issue to be presented before the TPO during the reevaluation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>