https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192640 A leave-and-licence arrangement, supported by the agreement form, the parties' conduct, society permission, and repeated fixed-term renewals, was treated as a licence rather than a lease; after termination by notice, continued occupation became unauthorised. The society was held to be a tenant co-partnership housing society on the basis of its bye-law amendments, registration records, and subsequent conduct. A dispute by the society seeking ejectment of a person occupying under a revoked licence by a nominal member was treated as a dispute touching the business of the society under section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, and section 28 of the Bombay Rent Act did not bar cooperative jurisdiction because no landlord-tenant relationship existed. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Jun 2017 16:55:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192640 A leave-and-licence arrangement, supported by the agreement form, the parties' conduct, society permission, and repeated fixed-term renewals, was treated as a licence rather than a lease; after termination by notice, continued occupation became unauthorised. The society was held to be a tenant co-partnership housing society on the basis of its bye-law amendments, registration records, and subsequent conduct. A dispute by the society seeking ejectment of a person occupying under a revoked licence by a nominal member was treated as a dispute touching the business of the society under section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, and section 28 of the Bombay Rent Act did not bar cooperative jurisdiction because no landlord-tenant relationship existed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192640