<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1458 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192639</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the addition of notional interest on advances, which was dismissed as the advances were made for business purposes. The matter of differences in books of account was remanded for reconciliation. The addition on account of low profitability was upheld due to the assessee&#039;s agreement and lack of material to counter the findings. The appeal was partly allowed, with the decision issued in April 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 16:44:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1458 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192639</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the addition of notional interest on advances, which was dismissed as the advances were made for business purposes. The matter of differences in books of account was remanded for reconciliation. The addition on account of low profitability was upheld due to the assessee&#039;s agreement and lack of material to counter the findings. The appeal was partly allowed, with the decision issued in April 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>