<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 379 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344108</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s service classification as Business Auxiliary Service, allowing them to benefit from notification 14/2004-S.T. dated 10.09.2004. The Tribunal found the activities conducted by the respondent qualified as education. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal determining no merit in their arguments. The judgment was delivered on 5.5.17.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 379 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344108</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the respondent&#039;s service classification as Business Auxiliary Service, allowing them to benefit from notification 14/2004-S.T. dated 10.09.2004. The Tribunal found the activities conducted by the respondent qualified as education. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the Tribunal determining no merit in their arguments. The judgment was delivered on 5.5.17.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>