<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 375 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344104</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by M/s. Vodafone Essar South Ltd. challenging the denial of CENVAT credit on towers and related parts was decided against the assessee. However, demands for the extended period and penalties were set aside. The Tribunal upheld the demand for inadmissible CENVAT credit within the normal limitation period, directing the Commissioner to quantify the demand within 60 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 06:02:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 375 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344104</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by M/s. Vodafone Essar South Ltd. challenging the denial of CENVAT credit on towers and related parts was decided against the assessee. However, demands for the extended period and penalties were set aside. The Tribunal upheld the demand for inadmissible CENVAT credit within the normal limitation period, directing the Commissioner to quantify the demand within 60 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>