<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 369 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344098</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the order denying cenvat credit, ruling in favor of the appellant due to lack of concrete evidence proving non-receipt of goods and failure to establish the actual source of goods used in manufacturing. The appellant&#039;s claim of receiving and using the goods for manufacturing final products was accepted, leading to the regularization of cenvat credit. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant with appropriate relief, if any.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471362" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 369 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344098</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the order denying cenvat credit, ruling in favor of the appellant due to lack of concrete evidence proving non-receipt of goods and failure to establish the actual source of goods used in manufacturing. The appellant&#039;s claim of receiving and using the goods for manufacturing final products was accepted, leading to the regularization of cenvat credit. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant with appropriate relief, if any.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>