<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 360 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344089</link>
    <description>Refund of special additional duty on imported goods remained available where the subsequent resale was covered by a VAT exemption and no VAT was charged. CESTAT applied the refund notification to hold that the requirement of payment of &quot;appropriate sales tax or VAT&quot; is satisfied even when the applicable VAT rate is nil, because the condition turns on the governing tax treatment rather than a minimum tax rate. The Tribunal also relied on departmental clarification that refund is not denied merely because the local tax rate is lower than the additional duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 06:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 360 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344089</link>
      <description>Refund of special additional duty on imported goods remained available where the subsequent resale was covered by a VAT exemption and no VAT was charged. CESTAT applied the refund notification to hold that the requirement of payment of &quot;appropriate sales tax or VAT&quot; is satisfied even when the applicable VAT rate is nil, because the condition turns on the governing tax treatment rather than a minimum tax rate. The Tribunal also relied on departmental clarification that refund is not denied merely because the local tax rate is lower than the additional duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>