<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 348 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344077</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the allowance of the bank&#039;s loan processing fees and restricting the disallowance under section 14A of the Act. The issues concerning the charging of interest and initiation of penalty were not extensively addressed in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2017 07:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=471341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 348 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344077</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the allowance of the bank&#039;s loan processing fees and restricting the disallowance under section 14A of the Act. The issues concerning the charging of interest and initiation of penalty were not extensively addressed in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>